Disposable FFP2 Masks – Cupped (Unvalved Respirator)
|WHAT YOU GET:|
|Mask: FFP2 AUST Certified Cupped Masks|
|Quantity: Box 20, Box 40|
|Size: Will fit all adults|
|FFP2 Certified: Yes (AUST Certification) EN149:2001+A1:2009|
|Activated Carbon: No|
|Padded Nose Bridge: Yes|
|Intended Industry Use: Medical, metalworking, painting, welding, mining, bushfires or construction|
|This is a top range, disposable respirator|
|Provides protection against dust, mist, fumes, and aerosols that are associated with metalworking, painting, welding, mining, bushfires or construction|
|FFP2 Masks are superior as they have a minimum 94% particle filtration efficiency and may be used for mechanically and thermally generated particles|
|Mask is comprised of three layers. The first layer is a Polyester non woven fabric that blocks large particle dust. The second layer has an electrostatic filter layer this allows physical absorption of all particulate matter. The third layer is comprised of cotton to ensure full 94% particle filtration.|
|Comfortable nose pad to reduce friction on the nose and increase the seal. Aluminium adjustable nose clip ensures the most protective seal and reduces air leakage.|
|Comfortable, lightweight fit|
|Australian Safety Standard Certified|
The most important aspects of P2 masks is that they can be used for mechanically and thermally generated particles.
There are 3 types of respirator classification systems that users in Australia may encounter:
The first, and most important for Australian users, is:
- Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 1716 “Respiratory Protective Devices”, then
- The United States National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) classification, and
- European standards (EN) for respirator classification.
Smith & ARROW P2 Masks hold this AS/NZS 1716 Certification. This certification means, P2 particulate filtering respirators must have a filter efficiency of at least 94% when tested with Sodium Chloride aerosol. The particle size of this aerosol has a mass median diameter of 0.3 to 0.6 microns with a range of particles in the 0.02 to 2 micron size range. This aerosol is delivered to the filter at a flow rate of 95litres/minute.
There are slight differences in airflow rates and particle sizes used in the various laboratory tests of respirator filter efficiency around the globe. These variations tend to accommodate the difference in minimum filter efficieny (95% vs 94%) between the classification systems. In practice these differences result in virtually no impact on the level of respiratory protection provided to wearers.